Welkom op het forum van startpagina!

Dit forum staat op alleen-lezen. Je kan hier informatie zoeken en oude berichten terugvinden, maar geen nieuwe berichten plaatsen.

Naar overzicht van alle forums

Verbruggen-Squinzi

  • Gerd

    UCI President all'attacco on Mapei boss

    The president of the UCI, Hein Verbruggen, has taken the extraordinary step of publicly criticising Mapei boss Georgio Squinzi in a letter published in the Italian sports newspaper, La Gazzetta dello Sport, last Thursday.

    Verbruggen's letter is a response to the decision last Tuesday by Squinzi to withdraw his company's support from the Mapei - Quick Step team, one of the most successful in the sport.

    As one of the major sponsors of cycling, Mapei's withdrawal will have severe ramifications not just for the sport, but also for the teams of elite Division 1 riders, and the emerging Division 3 squad, which features a plethora of talented young riders.

    When making this announcement last Tuesday, Squinzi said his reasons for ending Mapei's support were due to “the current problems in cycling and sport in general”, a veiled reference to the ongoing problem of doping.

    Relations between two of the sport's most powerful figures have been strained in the past, but now they are clearly at loggerheads. In his letter, Verbruggen first congratulated the cycling-keen boss, stating that Squinzi's team promoted a brand that was previously unknown, conceding that “despite the differences that characterise his personal relationship with the sports institutions, cycling has benefited from the model organisation of his team.”

    But then Verbruggen went on the attack, and Verbruggen suggested that the damage to be done to cycling following Mapei'ts decision to withdraw may be greater than Mapei's contribution to cycling. Mapei has supported cycling since 1993 and spent around US$100 million during that time.

    Verbruggen also criticised Squinzi for his intervention during the decisive moments of the 1996 Paris-Roubaix, where he dictated the order in which Museeuw, Ballerini and Tafi should finish to then directeur-sportif Patrick Lefevere by mobile telephone.

    Verbruggen suggests that Squinzi's decision to quit the sport of cycling was based not due to the recent doping scandals that have tainted his super-squadra, but “was probably dictated by internal contingencies within his company, which cannot unfortunately be made public”.

    Further comments included claims that Squinzi had ulterior motives to withdraw its association with the UCI and had plans to ruin the sport with unfounded accusations about doping in cycling “during the sport's most difficult moments, showing no form of critical but constructive solidarity whatsoever.”

    In addition to being critical of Mapei's failure to withdraw Stefano Garzelli from the Giro after his first anti-doping test was confirmed non-negative for probenecid, Verbruggen accused Mapei of attempting to create a cycling monopoly, with a team so large and powerful, “ready to commit itself to a disturbing destabilisation of the market by signing up every talented young rider”.

    Squinzi's response to Verbruggen

    By Tim Maloney and Jeff Jones

    Mapei boss Dr Giorgio Squinzi has responded to Hein Verbruggen's open letter that was published in the June 28 edition of La Gazzetta dello Sport. In it, Verbruggen strongly criticised the man who had invested around US$100 million into the sport over the past decade, accusing him of profiting from cycling to promote his “previously unknown brand” of industrial chemicals, and of "destablising the market by signing up every talented young rider."

    Dr Squinzi is currently President of Federchimica, the Italian association of chemical manufacturers, and is head of one of the world's biggest and most successful chemical companies. Verbruggen had insinuated that Squinzi and Mapei were nothing before they came into cycling, which Squinzi strongly refutes. In fact, Squinzi and Mapei have been recognized by none other than the Wall St.Journal as a model of entrepreneurial success while maintaining a strong sense of corporate responsibility. Mapei's chemical plants are known as being rigorously in line with strict EC ecological regulations governing chemical manufacturers.

    Furthermore, Mapei has effectively used cycling to gain publicity and brought other sponsors into the sport through their business model such as Quick-Step and Fassa Bortolo.

    Finally, in addition to sponsoring the world's number one division I team, Mapei has also been heavily involved in sponsoring young rider programs, both at the professional and amateur level. There are several developmental teams in Italy, Belgium, Spain and Australia, to name a few. The effects of Mapei pulling out of cycling will be felt globally.

    The full text of Dr Squinzi's letter follows:

    I have read the succession of articles published in the Gazzetta dello Sport, on 26 June 2002 (written by Angelo Zomegnan), 26 June 2002 (written by Candio Cannavò) and the open letter Hein Verbruggen of 28 June 2002 with the note from P. Cal. (Pietro Calabrese, director of the Gazzetta dello Sport).

    I will not reply directly to the contents of these articles, not because there are assumptions and reactions to insinuations and heavy judgments that have been expressed about my personal situation and that of the Mapei team, but because I think that these type of comments and reactions are the best confirmation of the wisdom of the decision taken to leave this cycling. Therefore I'll stop myself here.

    My attorneys tell me that the use of gratuitously offensive phrases and insinuations, which go beyond legitimate criticism or sporting controversy is technically called defamation. I'll leave it to them any further appraisal with respect to possible responses.

    Personally, I am now going to dedicate myself to consolidate the optimal business results of my company, that has gotten from cycling (besides having given abundantly) a lot of notoriety and attention.

    I cannot, moreover, forget that MAPEI S.P.A., first of all owes its fame to the person who started the company (my father) in 1937 and that it owes its reputation to the hard work and dedication of the staff during over 65 years of activity in the building industry, a company, therefore, Mapei that was anything but “unknown” (as Mr. Verbruggen said) before its entry into cycling, and was already world-wide leader in its field at the end of the 1980's.

    Best Regards,

    Dott. Giorgio Squinzi

    Mapei SPA

    Milan, 29 June 2002

    Bron: Cycling news.

    Heel kleintjes van Verbruggen…de druiven zijn zuur.

  • john beton

    Hein is gewoon nog wat pissed na de affaire Vandenbroucke die hij verloren heeft en slaat door. Er staan veertig renners of zo op straat en dan gaat Hein nog wat natrappen tegen DE sponsor van het wielrennen van de laatste jaren. Belachelijk en onbegrijpelijk.

  • Leon

    In één kritiekpunt heeft Verbruggen wel gelijk: dat Mapei de laatste 3 jaar zo ongeveer alle talenten voor de neus van andere ploegen heeft weggekaapt, om ze vervolgens een vrij beperkt programma te laten rijden.

    Bodrogi, Cancellara, Petrov, Rogers, Hulsmans, Wegelius, Paolini, Gasparre, Eisel, Koehler, D'Amore, Rizzi, Pozzato, Chesini, Sinkewitz, Zerzan. Een greep uit de neo-profs van Mapei in 3 seizoenen. Allemaal wereldtoppers al amateur of junior. En zeker de helft ervan is geflopt bij Mapei of nog steeds niet doorgebroken.

    Het is natuurlijk de eigen keuze van die jongens om in te gaan op een aanbod van Mapei, maar ik weet zeker (op enkele uitzonderingen na: Bodrogi, Cancellara) dat ze bij andere ploegen meer kansen zouden hebben gekregen. Squinzi en co hebben de markt min of meer afgeroomd door enerzijds veel geld te bieden en anderzijds van hun “naam” als grootste ploeg vh peloton te profiteren. Zodat de concurrentie niet in staat was de grootste talenten te strikken. Soort concurrentievervalsing dus.

  • john beton

    Dat ze veel van die jongeren een beperkt programma laten rijden vind ik net een goede zaak. Ik ken er maar drie dit jaar die onmiddellijk zijn doorgebroken en dat zijn dan de supertalenten Boonen (Parijs-Roubaix), Popovich (Giro) en Traksel (Veenendaal, wel al tweede jaar). Vele andere worden in hun eerste jaren opgebrand en daarom lijkt een voorzichtige doorbraak de juiste tactiek. Het zijn toch de dertigers die de koersen winnen. En Hulsmans en Aurelien Clerc hebben zich toch ook getoond in de koersen waar ze mochten starten. Maar ik begrijp je punt: aan de ene kant is er concurrentievervalsing door ee, maar aan de andere kant krijgen de beste jongeren wel de juiste begeleiding in hun eerste profjaren.

  • Marco

    Nee hoor, dit is zeker geen concurrentievervalsing.

    Mapei heeft qua begeleiding (en dan bedoel ik niet meteen doping) gewoon veel meer te bieden dan bepaalde andere ploegen. Verder zullen ook de salarissen wel in orde zijn, het valt best te begrijpen dat renners in dat opzicht ook eerder voor een in dat opzicht als betrouwbaar bekend staande ploeg kiezen.

    Vergelijk het beleid van Mapei eens met een ploeg als US Postal, die hebben nu toevallig een succesvolle neo-prof, maar zo'n ploeg betekent niets voor de opleiding van profs in vergelijking tot Mapei. (verder niets negatiefs over USP)

    Leon heeft wel gelijk met de constatering dat vele jonge toppers (nog) niet zijn doorgebroke, maar noem mij een ploeg waar dat wel zo is. Ook bij pak hem beet Fassa Bortolo of Telekom wordt niet elke topper bij de jeugd een topper bij de profs.

    Ik vind dit een zeer lompe actie van Verbruggen richting een van de meest betrouwbare sponsoren van de wielersport